and Ancheo Agostini –
On the eve of the results of the referendum currently underway in the self-proclaimed republics of Luhansk and Donetsk and in the regions of Zaporozhye and Kherson, I would like to make some considerations
Premetto innanzitutto una tabella che riporta i dati actuali rilevati dal sito della CIA concernenti le minoranze russe in alcuni ex Paesi della funta Unione Sovetsica. Ritengo che tali dati posso essere considerati al di sopra di ogni sospetto di russofilia. The percentages of other countries accompanying Ukraine could presage problematic analogies.
font: CIA.
In addition, the Donbass region has a population density that is twice as high as the Ukrainian average, and even without resorting to suspicions from Russian sources, it can be inferred that the largest concentration of Russian-speaking people resides in the eastern regions. del Paese. This supposition is also supported by some previous popular consultations on the topic of autonomy and the use of the Russian language, which took place in a period in which they still did not follow suit. I dati provengono dal on Wikipedia in Russian.
“In March 1994, in connection with the parliamentary elections in Ukraine, when the referendum took place, a “discussion” was formally accepted in the regions (oblasts) of Donetsk and Luhansk.
The results of the voting in the Danetsk region were as follows:
1. Is there agreement that the Constitution of Ukraine should sanction the federal-territorial structure of Ukraine?
– For – 79.69%
– Contrario – 15.02%
– Schede non valide – 5.29%.
– Senza considere le schede non valide – 84.14%.
2. Is there agreement on the fact that the Constitution of Ukraine should recognize the use of the Russian language as the language of the State of Ukraine next to the Ukrainian language?
– For – 87.16%
– Against – 8.54%
– Schede non valide – 4.30%.
– Senza considere le schede non valide – 91.08%.
3. I agree with the fact that on the territory of the region of Donetsk (Luhansk) the language of work, office work and documentation, as well as instruction and science should be accompanied by Russian language Ukrainian?
– For – 88.98%
– Against – 6.86%
– Schede non valide – 4.15%.
– Senza considere le schede non valide: favorable – 92.84%.
4. Is it favorable to the signing of the Charter of the CSI, to the full participation of Ukraine in the Union Economica and the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Countries of the CSI? (not 1994 era sinonimo di integrazione eurosiatica)
– For – 88.72%.
– Against – 6.82%
– Schede non valide – 4.45%.
– Escluding le schede non valide: a favore – 92.86%.
L’affluenza alle urne è stata del 72%.
Resultati del voto nell’oblast’ di Lugansk
And the following voting results in the Luhansk region:
1. Do you agree with the fact that the Constitution of Ukraine has sanctioned the use of the Russian language as the language of the State of Ukraine alongside the Ukrainian language?
– For – 90.38%
– Against – 5.04%
– Schedule not valid: 4.58%.
– Senza considere le schede non valide – 94.72%.
2. Does it agree with the fact that in the territory of the region of Lugansk the language of work, the practice of office and documentation, as well as the instruction and science must be Russian acccanto all’ucraino?
– For – 90.91 %
– Against – 4.51%.
– Schedule not valid: 4.58%.
-Senza considera le schede non valide – 95.27%.
3. Is it favorable to the signing of the Charter of the CSI, to the full participation of Ukraine in the Union Economica and the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Countries of the CSI? (nel 1994 era sinonimo di integrazione eurosiatica).
– For – 90.74%
– Against – 4.54%
– Schedule not valid: 4.72%.
– Escluding le schede non valide: a favore – 95.24%.
The domain on the “federal structure of Ukraine” was not posted in the survey of Lugansk.
L’affluenza alle urne è stata del 75%”.
It should be noted that in Italy, in front of the presence of an infinitely lower German language minority (0.5% of a population of 61 million), the Trentino-Alto Adige Region, after a long period of conflict, had obtained a Statute in 1972 d’autonomia, che abbrevi posto le basi per la convivenza pacifica dei gruppi etnici italiano e tedesco.
In 2014, at the beginning of the intra-Ukrainian conflict, the Italy-Suedtirol accords were the model of the proposal of the German President, then Minister of Foreign Affairs, FW Steinmeier to regulate the relations between the self-proclaimed Republics of Luhansk and Donetsk and the governo ukraino e per la soluzione del conflitto. The Steinmeier Formula was translated into the Protocol and subsequently signed by the Minsk Agreement signed by former Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma, former Russian ambassador Mihail Zurabov, leader of Lugansk and Donetsk leader of Lugansk and Donetsk Igor Plotnitsky and Alexander Zakharchenko and Heidi Tagliavini, all’epoca representative dell’OSCE per l’Ukraina il 12 febbraio 2015. L’accordo prevedeva una riforma constituzionale in Ukraina che consentisse il riconoscimento di uno statuto spe ciale per le due regioni. In addition, a conjoint declaration of the representatives of Russia, Ukraine and the guaranteed countries followed: “Il Presidente della Federazione Russa Vladimir Putin, il Presidente dell’Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, il Presidente della Repubblica Francese François Hollande il il Chancellor della Repubblica Federal Tedesca Angela Merkel rebadiscono il loro pieno rispetto per la sovranità and l’integlità territoriale dell’Ukraina. Credono firmamente che non ci siano alternative a una soluzione exclusively pacifica. Sono pienamente dispositi a entrendere ogni possibile misura sia individuale che congiunta a tal fine”.
Gli attuali rapporti tesi tra i politiki ukraini e il Presidente Tedesco Steinmeier ora actuato di russofilia sembrano tradire l’identidad e la responsabilita di chi fece fallire gli accordi sottoscritti non riconoscendo ne’ l’autonomia ne’ l’uso della propria lingua ai concitatadini ukraini del Donbass.
Ora, doing banalmente i conti della serva, anche basandosi sugli dati muniti di imprimatur democratico reportati above, si può supporre che la stragrande majority di quei 12.8 milioni di Russofoni, che representa il il il 29.6% della popolazione ukraina, si trovino appunto nelle regioni orientali dell’Ukraine e che questi, dopo 8 anni di bombardamenti “amico”, non abjoni bisogno, as declara la Baerbock, di essere menacati coi kalashnikov per votare favore dell’annessione alla Russia.
